Image: a brown-haired woman wearing glasses and a light blue turtleneck sweater holds one hand to her mouth in a "zipped lips" gesture.

Right now’s put up is by editor and ghostwriter Jacqueline Salmon.


Each author within the publishing enterprise is, or must be, schooled within the “Silence means no” observe of the publishing business. That’s, should you don’t get a response from an editor or literary agent inside an affordable interval, assume it’s a rejection and transfer on.

Gone are the times of well mannered rejection letters—typed, mailed, and typically even providing useful suggestions or solutions for enchancment.

I get that. Who has time now for this outdated observe—even in an electronic mail? And I do know that brokers and editors fear any response would possibly set off a blizzard of emails from anguished, inexperienced writers clogging their inboxes, asking, “However why?” and “How can I repair it?”

However what considerations me is that the “Silence means no” observe is increasing in insidious methods.

Previously few months, two of my writer purchasers have been met with silence after submitting initiatives to brokers—regardless of each brokers having expressed robust curiosity and welcoming the submission. There was not even an acknowledgment to the author that the submission had been acquired. Well mannered follow-up queries by the authors a number of weeks later asking for affirmation of receipt have been additionally met with silence.

Is there something incorrect with a short “Sorry, this now not meets our wants” and then slam down the cone of silence? It takes 5 seconds to sort these seven phrases and hit ship. I timed it.

When a once-promising challenge will get radio silence, the author’s caught. Do they preserve ready—for 2 months? Six? Perhaps there’s nonetheless curiosity, and it’s simply taking time. However with out readability, giving up and submitting elsewhere dangers offending the agent or writer who had initially invited the submission.

Responding, even after expressing preliminary curiosity, may open that floodgate to follow-up emails, particularly since some form of relationship—nonetheless tenuous—had been established. However I do know loads of writer-pros who would suck it up, be taught from the rejection, and transfer on. I’m wondering if brokers and editors typically underestimate how skilled some writers actually are.

Past the potential injury to a author’s publishing path, there’s one other danger. who all the time responds to writers quick and enthusiastically? Scammers. To be clear, not everybody who replies promptly is illegitimate. However after sufficient silence from the respectable publishing world, disheartened writers turn into extra weak to the siren name of a rising variety of predatory gamers concentrating on them.

“However they have been so useful,” a lately scammed shopper advised me. This ‘writer’ responded instantly, answered all of his questions, and made him really feel like his e-book actually mattered.

In fact they did. In addition they took him for $30,000.

To be clear, I’m not saying the respectable publishing business is accountable when writers fall for scams. And writers must know that fixed rejection is a actuality of the publishing enterprise. To be sincere, it’s a brutal business.

However when an agent or editor has expressed curiosity, 5 seconds is all it takes to set expectations and keep away from confusion. Simply 5 seconds so the author can transfer on.

And it’s not solely writers who get ghosted like this. A hybrid writer lately reached out to ask me to espresso. I accepted and requested for dates. Then, nothing. A month later, I adopted up with a fast be aware, assuming my response to her had gotten buried in her electronic mail. Nonetheless no response. The irony:  I’ve two purchasers severely enthusiastic about publishing hybrid who’re in a position to cowl the numerous prices.

However any likelihood I’d refer them to her? Gone.