When the police arrived, additionally they suggested Dershowitz to make use of non-gendered pronouns. Dershowitz was hesitant. “I’ll use no matter language I select to make use of,” he informed the police. “That’s a matter between me and my grammarian — not something the police ought to have something to say over.”

— New York Journal 7/31/05

– – –

All proper, look. (I proceed to want that formulation to the more and more in style “Alright, look,” as a result of whereas, in contrast to a few of my extra prescriptive colleagues, I’ve no quarrel with the adjectival “alright,” within the interjectory context—however I digress.) Please know that I’m now not employed by Alan Dershowitz.

Alan and I all the time had a considerably tenuous enterprise association to start with. He first approached me within the Eighties, when it was commonplace for rich people to maintain full-time non-public grammarians on employees.

I’d take my pink pencil to drafts of most of his public communications, and even some private correspondence, similar to when he informed his first spouse to [OMITTED ON ADVICE OF COUNSEL] shortly earlier than she [DITTO]. Merciless that letter might have been, however from a purely linguistic standpoint? Impeccable!

But even within the heady Nineties—the played-by-Ron-Silver days, the O.J. days—he all the time made certain to maintain my hours below a threshold that may have triggered sure tax withholding necessities. I recall one event when Alan was struggling over a comma splice, which I used to be on the verge of resolving for him, when he regarded on the clock and abruptly despatched me residence, muttering concerning the excessive value of staff’ compensation insurance coverage.

Over time, he continued to show to me when he wanted a development parallelized or a modifier undangled. Within the wake of his affiliation with Mr. Epstein, although, his requests took a distasteful flip. For instance, a press release during which he was decided to say that whereas a specific encounter on the Epstein residence had “ended fortunately,” it was not in reality a “glad ending” as such issues are generally outlined.

It was shortly after this that I parted methods with Alan, recommending he seek the advice of one of many boutique syntax retailers or perhaps a Large 4 mauve-shoe grammar agency for his wants.

Which brings us to the current kerfuffle. To start with: “Not something the police ought to have something to say over”? Alan, Alan, Alan. Maybe you wanted me greater than I knew.

However as to the matter of Mr. Dershowitz’s pronoun choice, I wish to emphasize that such a selection wouldn’t fall below my purview even had been I nonetheless on his payroll.

The right way to discuss with a single merchandise bought—or, in Alan’s case, withheld from sale—by this principled vendor? I may also help with that. It’s pierog, because it occurs.

However intentionally misgendering the seller? That simply makes one a bloodyminded (I want this to the hyphenated type) prick.

I hope this clarifies issues.